1. Telefunken 251 Microphone
  2. Vintage Telefunken Mic
  3. Telefunken Microphone Review

The AKG Model C 12 multi-directional condenser microphone The AKG C 12 is a studio condenser micro­phone of the highest professional quality. It has been specially designed for use in sound recording and broad­casting studios, and is the choice of many studios both at home and abroad. Nine different directional characteristics can be selected by means of a remote control unit without any change in frequency response or sensitivity. In addition to three basic characteristics, omni-directional, cardioid and bi-directional, six intermediate patterns (including hypercardioids) are available.

The S 12 control unit is connected to the N 12 power supply unit by the RL 12 remote control cable, and the power supply unit to the micro­phone by the MK 12 mic cable. Technical Data.

Frequency Range: 20 to 20,000 cps. Frequency Response: ± 2 dB related to published curve. Directional Characteristics (nine different positions): omni-directional. Cardioid: better than 20 dB front-to-back ratio at 180° sound incidence, bi-directional: 20 dB front-to-back ratio. Sensitivity: 1.0 mV/µbar (–60 dB re 1 V/dyne/cm 2), unloaded (200 ohms).

Equivalent Noise Level: less than 20 dB. Impedance: 50/200 ohms (change solder lugs). Tube Complement: 1 x 6072, 6.3 volts DC filament voltage, 120 volts DC plate voltage. Mains Connection: 110/125/145/220/245 volts AC at 50/60 cps. Stand Connector: 3⁄ 8', ½', 5⁄ 8'-27 with micro­phone cable MK 12. Dimensions: 10' (255 mm) with connector, 11⁄ 16' diameter (43 mm).

Weight: 1 lb. Net (560 g), shipping weight 29 lbs. (13.5 kg) The AKG C 12 was introduced in 1953 and production continued until 1963. The C 12 was the world’s first remote-controllable multi-pattern large-diaphragm micro­phone, and about 2,500 of them were produced during its ten-year run. OEM versions of the C 12 were also produced for Siemens (SM 203, SM 204) and for Telefunken (ELA M 251). February 2008 update, thanks to Mr. Holger de Buhr: “The truth is that the first remote-controllable multi-pattern large-diaphragm micro­phone was the M 49, originally designed by the Nordwestdeutsches Rundfunk, Hamburg, in 1949 (early postwar German state broadcaster, later NDR and WDR).

The first M 49 mics were manufactured with M 7 capsules, and Mayhak Hamburg power supplies were used. Later the M 49 used K 47 capsules and Neumann Berlin power supplies.” The AKG C 12 is considered “the holy grail” of micro­phones by audio engineers for its beautiful three-dimensional vocal quality—a result of the combination of its hand-tensioned, edge-terminated AKG capsule and the rare GE 6072 triode tube.

Original C 12s regularly sell for $10,000 to $15,000 and some have fetched upwards of $30,000—many times their original price (even factoring inflation) thanks to its combination of rarity and high performance. The unit shown in these photographs was won on eBay for $6,862 on October 23, 2005. The C 12 is still influencing the art of large-diaphragm condenser recording micro­phones more than fifty years after its introduction. Its CK 12 capsule was the first to have the acoustic “fingerprint” in its frequency response for which other AKG micro­phones have become famous: a small dip at around two kHz and a well-chosen presence rise.

Wireless

Download the The Telefunken Models ELA M 250, 251 multi-directional condenser microphones The following photographs and schematics are provided through the courtesy of John Warshaw. Download the Mr. Warshaw writes: The Telefunken ELA M 250/251 was made for Telefunken by AKG after Neumann discontinued its OEM production of the Telefunken U 47. Of course Neumann still made the U 47 for many years. Telefunken needed a quality condenser, and AKG stepped in. The differences between the C 12 and the ELA M 250 are small but important.

The C 12 is remotely controlled for pattern by polarizing the rear diaphragm with a separate variable voltage from the power supply, while the ELA M 250/251 has switches in the capsule assembly that change its polarization pattern. The 250 has two patterns, Omni and Cardioid. The 251 included these patterns and also the figure eight. The second difference is in the circuit. The C 12 and ELA M 250 circuits are similar but not identical. They both use the CK 12 capsule, T/14 transformer and either the 6072A tube (US version) or the AC701 (Europe), but the grid coupling, cathode bias and capsule polarization are different.

Third, the body style of the C 12 and ELA M 250 are not the same. Most important, the head grilles are different, so acoustics are also different. The photo of the black mic is not an AKG model but was made by an east German company by the name of Thiele, a rather unknown brand from the forties and fifties.

I bought this on ebay five years ago and rewired it in the spirit of the ELA M 250. It works great and I have used it on the KPIG live radio shows on Sunday mornings with Sleepy John. Download a of the original C 12 (German and English).

Will this young gun fire the imagination like the Telefunkens of old? Photo: Mike CameronThe Telefunken name that we associate with rare and valuable microphones and preamplifiers dates back to well before World War 1. Telefunken were set up in Berlin as a collaboration between Siemens & Halske and the General Electricity Company and by 1939 the parent company had a staff of over 23,000 workers. In 1941 AEG bought Siemens & Halske, and in 1967 Telefunken were merged with AEG and the company renamed AEG-Telefunken.

AEG were bought by Daimler in 1985, and the Telefunken name dropped from the name, though Daimler-Chrysler still use it as a brand within Europe. Connecticut-based Telefunken USA were incorporated in 2001, after acquiring the rights to the Telefunken name, though founder Toni Fishman had been working on his ideas for a couple of years before that.

He apparently started out by looking at the possibility of providing replacement parts for some very rare and valuable vintage mics, including some Telefunken models, but ended up wondering if his company could just build the whole thing from scratch to replicate the original — and clearly he could! Initially, it was the Telefunken Ela M251 model that took Toni's attention. The original was developed during the 1950s in collaboration with Vienna-based AKG, as a competitor to the Neumann U47, and it used the famous AKG CK12 capsule. This capsule, the 6072 tube and the model T14 transformer were the same key parts as used in the AKG C12, so the models are inevitably similar in some respects, and the Ela M251 actually replaced the C12. Before Telefunken USA could attempt to replicate an Ela M251, they had to reverse-engineer and document the original, because there was no blueprint available. As you might expect, building an exact replica of the original capsule was the greatest challenge, as this particular model has a somewhat complicated design and sells at a premium price. Exact replicas of microphones that are impossibly rare and hugely valuable don't come cheap!

Vashikaran mantra malayalam pdf books

For the rest of us, Telefunken USA have developed the RFT AK47 tube mic, which draws on the design ethos of microphones like the U47 but uses newly designed circuitry, based around more readily available parts, including a purpose-built AMI/TAB Funkenwerke B47 audio transformer, wound for them in the US. The one-inch-diameter dual capsule is sourced 'overseas' (which probably means the Far East), and uses a pair of six-micron sputtered gold-on-Mylar diaphragms. The tube is a NOS (New Old Stock) EF732 miniature wire-ended device (also used in some Soundelux microphones) that is soldered directly to the circuit board. The AK47 has a wonderfully retro look, with black crackle paint on the body and bright plating to the basket and surrounding metalwork. The output transformer is a substantial-looking piece of engineering, and the main circuitry is built from good-quality components hand-soldered to a single-sided, glass-fibre PCB. A small metal U-clamp secures the miniature tube, and the body shell is held in place by means of a bright-plated locking ring at the mic's base.

A seven-pin XLR cable connects the microphone to the power supply, which is a simple steel box with a three-pin balanced XLR output connector, a nine-position pattern switch (omni, through various widths of cardioid, to figure-of-eight) and a switched IEC mains inlet. The PSU has grey, hammer-finish paint and both mic and PSU bear the distinctive Telefunken logo. Overall, the AK47 measures 46 x 240mm and weighs a substantial 30.5 ounces.

This rather impressive-looking side-address microphone comes in a wooden box with a shockmount, a remote power supply and a Gotham GAC7 cable. A five-year limited warranty comes with the mic, which is aimed at serious project studios, smaller pro studios and the broadcast market. Like most large-diaphragm studio mics, the AK's frequency response isn't ruler-flat, and as well as a very slight presence peak there's a noticeable mid-range dip at around 300 to 400Hz.

At the low end the response rolls off gently below 200Hz, presumably to counter proximity effect in cardioid mode, and at the high end the roll-off starts at 15-16kHz. A frequency response of 20Hz to 20kHz is quoted, but from the included frequency-response graph made for this specific microphone, I'd say the two extremes are around 10dB down relative to the output of the mic between 200Hz and 10kHz. Not that this matters a jot, of course, because what makes mics of this type so attractive is the way they sound, rather than how they look on paper.

One paper specification that does matter is noise, and this mic manages a 76dB S/N ratio and a sensitivity of 14mV/Pa. At 125dB, the maximum SPL is a little lower than for most studio mics, but that's still adequate for all but the loudest sources, and I'd expect this model to be used mainly for vocals or acoustic instruments, rather than kick drums!

Telefunken 251 Microphone

I used the AK47 on a long vocal session and it performed faultlessly, capturing a well-balanced sound that managed to be both solid at the low end and smooth at the top. The tube 'character' isn't overdone, and the investment in a decent audio output transformer seems to have paid off, as the high-end detail remains intact without getting gritty. While tube mics tend to be slightly more noisy than their solid-state counterparts, noise isn't an issue in typical studio applications and, used with a standard pop screen, the mic had no tendency to over-react to plosive 'B' and 'P' sounds. I also tried this mic on acoustic guitar, where it put in a good performance (though I wouldn't buy one specifically for that application).

Vintage Telefunken Mic

As with all large-diaphragm mics, the AK47 isn't going to perform as accurately as a small-diaphragm model in omni mode, but provided the sound being recorded is positioned in front of it, it delivers. I used it mainly in cardioid mode but, even then, having a choice of cardioid widths was very useful. Whether this mic is worth the asking price is a more subjective question. I've tried less costly tube mics that sound every bit as smooth, but I think you have to work with a mic for a long time to discover its true strengths. Also, you often find that cheaper mics sound great on one voice and quite disappointing on another. The Telefunken name has kudos, and although this model isn't one of their high-end vintage recreations it certainly looks the part.

More importantly, it delivers a very credible sound. Though not exactly bargain basement, the AK47 isn't overpriced for a multi-pattern tube mic, and you get a decent shockmount, so although there are cheaper options this model has its attractions — especially when you consider how smoothly it captures vocals. I certainly enjoyed using the AK47 and very quickly took it for granted, which I'd suggest is the sign of a good microphone: if you have to keep thinking about a mic during a session to coax a good sound out of it, arguably it isn't such a top performer.

Telefunken Microphone Review

With the AK47 I got a great sound both really close to the singer and 12-14 inches away. In fact, it seemed that wherever I pointed it I got a positive result, and I needed little or no EQ to arrive at the sound I wanted. Which is, of course, what we're all looking for. All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2018. All rights reserved.

The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers. Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates & SOS.